The Editors highlight three aspects of OMB’s recently proposed rule changes as particularly striking: that decisions on research funding would be made by political appointees, that funding could ...

Scientists across multiple disciplines are raising the alarm after the White House proposed taking greater control over how scientific research gets funded and allowing political appointees to decide ...

Some lawmakers have recently shown interest in similar restrictions. Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI), chair of the House Select ...

A new kind of institutional vandalism appeared last month in the form of a 412-page Trump administration regulatory proposal ...

Biosafety and biosecurity are vital components of life science research. As such, funding for research with infectious agents or toxins should take into account the type of work being proposed, the ...

On Thursday the White House released long-anticipated draft regulations that, if enacted, would give political appointees the final word on federal research grants and other funding across government ...

The U.S. government spends over $160 billion annually on scientific research. This massive expense is marketed to taxpayers as an investment in groundbreaking research that fuels innovation and ...

A Trump administration budget proposal would essentially eliminate one of the world’s foremost Earth sciences research operations. By Austyn Gaffney Trump administration officials are recommending the ...

Research & Proposal Development Services provides year-long comprehensive guidance through the NSF CAREER support program. In this program, we work one-on-one with interested PIs to provide a proposal ...

It might seem surprising, but federal research funding isn’t just for scientists. A component of many federal grants that support basic research requires that discoveries be shared with nonscientists.